Compliance Reporting
A return assembled by hand each period is expensive and unverifiable. We build the derivation once, so producing the return is a run rather than a project.
What this covers
Data sourcing
Fields taken from the operating systems that own them.
Derivation
How each figure is calculated, written down and versioned.
Validation
Checks that catch the errors before a regulator does.
Sign-off
Who approved which submission, recorded.
Submission
Filed in the required format, with the receipt retained.
History
What was submitted last period and what changed since.
Who this is for
Regulated firms
Periodic returns with penalties for error.
Listed companies
Internal control reporting with an audit behind it.
Public bodies
Statutory returns on a fixed calendar.
Certified operations
Evidence for accreditation and inspection.
How we work
People who have done it before
Teams that have worked in this setting, not a generic squad reading the brief for the first time.
One team, start to finish
The people who design it are the people who build it and the people who answer for it afterwards.
Working software early
Something running in weeks, so the direction is judged against a real thing rather than a document.
Bought once, owned by you
What you keep at the end
The code, the documentation and the accounts are yours throughout. Nothing here depends on us staying, and any arrangement that continues does so because it is worth continuing.
Talk to us
What we promise
- A named team you can reach, not an account manager relaying questions
- A working version early, and every fortnight after that
- Written estimates with the assumptions and the risks stated
- Your code, your data and your accounts, yours throughout
- A direct answer when something is late or will not work
How it runs
Scope
What the solution has to do, what it must integrate with, and what is deliberately out.
Pilot
A working configuration with one team or one process, measured against how it works today.
Roll out
Extended in stages, each with a way back if it does not hold.
Improve
Measured after launch and changed on evidence, which is when most of the value arrives.
Common questions
That is the main design goal: a rule change should be an edit to a definition rather than a rebuild.
Whoever your framework says, and the system records it rather than relying on an email.
Supported, with the reason and the approver recorded alongside.
No. It gives them something to check rather than something to reconstruct.
Would this work here?
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether this fits your situation. If it does not, we will say so.
Get in touch